Family law is a wide field and most of the best family lawyers in Houston, TX often have to provide their services for a wide range of issues the most common of which are explained below:
Divorce – the legal termination of a marriage through divorce is a complicated affair that requires the input of a qualified divorce lawyer to complete successfully. Without the help of a Houston divorce attorney, the process can be very time-consuming and there is no guarantee that you will get the outcome that you want. Besides filing the divorce papers in court, the attorney will also help the divorcing couples iron out issues that directly affect their future after the divorce will have been finalized.
Child custody – the determination of child custody after a divorce is a difficult subject to deal with mainly because, in most cases, both parents usually want to remain in the lives of their children even though they may no longer be with their spouses. A good family lawyer can help you fight for and secure both legal and physical custody of your children during and even after the divorce process has been completed successfully.
Alimony – most divorces usually come with provisions for alimony payments. Alimony payments are the payments made to either spouse for their own upkeep and a good family lawyer can help you get more payment, if you are the recipient, or pay less money, if you are the one paying the alimony.
Child support – as with alimony, you can hire a family lawyer in Houston to help you either reduce or fight for more money in child support payments depending on who is expected to make the payments under the terms of the divorce.
Prenuptial agreements – family lawyers do not only help with the dissolution of marriages but can also be brought in at their formation. They can help you draft prenuptial agreements that lay down the terms under which the marriage could and would be terminated.
Considering the diverse nature of the kind of work that is done by estate planning lawyers, it is not easy to list down all the types of situations where the help of such an attorney could be required. In addition, it is also hard to say how much involvement you would need from such lawyers as that too will depend on the specific situation at hand. Sometimes their involvement could be purely consultative or advisory while at other times they might have to roll up their sleeves and have to actually implement what you need in person. A good example of this can be seen in divorce. If you are going through a contested divorce and there is a significant amount of property involved then now would be the time to bring in a san diego Criminal attorneys.
Note that even though the title might imply that they are coming to help you keep the property or protect it from your ex-spouse, they can also be brought in when you want to smoothly transfer the said property to your ex.
Normally this subject is supposed to be handled by your divorce lawyer but there is a limit to what they can do for you when the value of the property in question is significant or when there are complex procedures to be followed in implementing the transfer.
Company succession is another example of a situation where an asset protection attorney’s help might prove invaluable. This can happen in two ways. Firstly, if you are the owner or shareholder in a company and you want that ownership or those shares to be transferred to someone of your choosing upon your demise then you can hire an asset protection lawyer who will help you draft all the right papers while you are still alive and who will make sure that your instructions are followed and the transfer successfully made once you pass away.
The second way this could go is if you were the person for whom the ownership of a company or significant shares in a company are being handed over.
In such cases, you would need to hire an estate planning lawyer, specifically an asset protection lawyer, to help make sure that you receive what is rightly yours.
They say that law is a system of rules. If you do a bad thing you will get punished, if you’re proven innocent then you’ll be free. But what if everything it’s not black and white. I’m here to talk about one case that changed law history. Like any other law criminal law is also a part of law, but it relates to criminal felonies. It controls community plan and forbid whatever is dangerous and harmful to the estate, aspect, security, and moral welfare of people.
Every man who violates this, will be punished.Everyone who kills or steal is a criminal offender. But in unusual actions defenses can apply to some peculiar acts. That act which I would like to talk about is the 19th-century English case of R v Dudley and Stephens, which tested a defense of necessity. I would like to explain the case.
The Mignonette was a ship that should sail from Southampton to Sydney. However, the boat sank and three crew members, including a 17-year-old cabin boy, were lost on a raft. They had nothing to eat and the boy was going to die first. The other had no choice and had to kill a boy and eat him.
Although they survived, because people found them, they were about to experience something unexpected. They were accused of murder. Their argument was that they had to kill the cabin boy because they wouldn’t survive. Lord Chief Justice Lord Coleridge, who was a prosecutor,then said: “to preserve one’s life is generally speaking a duty, but it may be the plainest and the highest duty to sacrifice it.” Their sentence was to be hanged, but all of sudden something strange happened. People, to be specific, public opinion and his mineola criminal attorney , show their solidarity with the accused. People understood their need to survive.They were sentenced in the end, but only in six months. The Crown had to intervene. That was the only way they could be saved from hanging. This case had been archived to one of the most important cases of UK history. Question you need to ask is: Were their sentence been the right one?
Should they be hanged, or in this case blessed with this six months jail sentence? I don’t know your opinion but I’m with the public opinion. They had do to do what they need to survive.